Dr. Wiliam Kelley and Dr John Beard and The Unitarian Trophoblastic Theory

Dr John Beard and The Unitarian Trophoblastic Theory
by  Dr Duffy DC
Here is the truth about cancer and the truth about fact #1. Dr John Beard of Scotland discovered the cause of all cancers and published a paper on The Unitarian Trophoblastic Theory of cancer in 1902. Cancer, while having multifactorial stimuli that will cause the process of the initial replication of the undifferentiated cell, has in fact, one root cause - a deficiency of pancreatic enzymes. Everything else associated, "goes along for the ride" so to speak.
John Beard stated, and later proved clinically, that cancer was the result of failure of the Pancreas to produce proper amounts of pancreatic enzymes. He stated that cells left over from embryonic development of the fetus are scattered throughout our bodies and later in life are occasionally stimulated to begin reproducing. [by some local stimulant such as environmental poison, drug, food, injury etc.] It is the job of pancreatic enzymes to digest these cells the moment they begin to multiply.
In the absence or deficiency of pancreatic enzymes, these primitive cells begin to multiply and the result is cancer, the rapid, uncontrolled growth of undifferentiated cells.
As a result of Beard's announcement, which was promptly rejected by his peers, there soon [by 1911] were forty clinics in London, England curing cancer using crude pancreatic enzymes -however Madam Curie came along and convinced people that Xray was the way to go because it was so "safe" and "effective" and the pancreatic cancer cure was quickly forgotten for several decades.
In the absence or deficiency of Pancreatic enzymes, Sympathetic dominant patients will end up with solid tumors in brain, pancreas, stomach, liver etc., Parasympathetic dominants will end up with the "soft" blood related cancers. The Sympathetic dominants need a more vegetarian based diet, the Parasympathetics need a more meat based/animal protein diet.
The trophoblast cells of pregnancy are typical cancer cells that eat into the uterine lining to prepare the nest. These cells are eventually turned off when the fetal pancreas turns on, otherwise the cancer of pregnancy ensues and kills the mother and baby very quickly. This was the key to Beard's discovery of the link between cancer and pancreatic insufficiency - the fact that in every specie he investigated, it was the turn on of the pancreas that coincided with the end of growth of the trophoblast cells of pregnancy. Trophoblast cells of pregnancy are exactly like cancer cells. Based upon his theory an early cure of a sarcoma was effected by one of his MD friends who injected the pancreatic enzymes - they believed, [incorrectly] that the enzymes needed to be injected because digestion would inactivate them. This is not true, pancreatic enzymes survive digestion and go on to digest cancer cells in the body, [fortunately for us].
Another Beard [Howard] came along and devised the HcG "Anthrone test" to measure female hormone in the urine. The test is based upon the fact that trophoblast cells of pregnancy, like all cancer cells, excrete HcG. Back in the early seventies these tests were performed on males and females. If you showed the hormone in the urine you were considered to be either a pregnant female or a male or female with cancer. 
Howard Beard jokingly stated at the Cancer Control Society seminar back in the seventies that he had some tumors in his bowel and when they got too big he would stop eating donuts and go back on his pancreatic enzymes to shrink the tumors back down. Back then Laetrile, vitamin B17, was being directly injected into the veins of cancer patients as part of the cure but the nutritional cure rate was only about one third - due to the mistaken idea that everyone needed a vegetarian diet and needed to avoid animal protein.
William Donald Kelley, a dentist from Grapevine, Texas, cured himself of pancreatic cancer in the sixties and went on to develop the present nutritionally based, do-it-yourself home cure for cancer which is probably over ninety per cent effective in patients who have not been overly destroyed by chemotherapy and orthodox treatments.
None need die of cancer. However, it is a full time job to cure yourself of cancer. The cause and cure are known and at hand. It has been developed by Kelley over the last thirty years. Instructions to follow are on my website. www.testingcancer.com
While I am at it here this morning let me add one more thing. The literature abounds with nonsense about viruses and how they "cause" all sorts of disease processes and do all sorts of strange and destructive things. Get this point - no virus has life, the minimum requirement of which is metabolism and reproduction which requires a cell wall or at the very least, a membrane. For life to exist there must be the ability to take in energy, metabolize it, and then store the energy in a form of information that will allow reproduction of the thing that is "DOING" the metabolizing and reproducing. Therefore, since no virus has the power of metabolism and reproduction, no virus can "DO" anything. The virus is "DONE TO" by sick cells. A sick cell will produce a "bad" virus. A sick cell might even allow a virus entry into its domain. The cell will then "DO" all the "DOING" that is "DONE" - because the virus - not having any life, cannot "do" anything - a lot of otherwise intelligent men have been led  down the path by all this junk science being generated in labs around the country, most of it at taxpayers expense. What we need to do as quickly as possible is, get these people off the dole and get their hands out of the public till. We need to start denying tax money to pursue these stupid projects - and we need to get big government OUT OF THE MEDICAL BUSINESS!!! 
Keep in mind that modern medicine has not cured a single degenerative disease. NOT ONE!!! Every degenerative disease that has ever been cured has been cured by an essential food factor - not a prescription drug - and every single degenerative disease is caused by either an environmental poison, most of which are introduced into our environment by medical quacks and quack scientists or by malnutrition.
 Not one single degenerative disease ever suffered by a human was due to a deficiency in a prescription drug.
 William Donald Kelley describes the approach in his momentous book with the extremely humble and deceiving title of "One Answer To Cancer", indeed - it is the ONLY answer to cancer in my studied [over fifty years] opinion.
Dr Daniel H Duffy Sr
Geneva, Ohio
REFERENCES
1. Beard, J: "The Action of Trypsin..." Br Med J 4, 140-41, 1906.
2. Beard, J: "The Enzyme Treatment of Cancer" London: Chatto and Windus, 1911.
3. Cutfield, A: "Trypsin Treatment in Malignant Disease" Br Med J 5, 525, 1907.
4. Wiggin, FH: "Case of Multiple Fibrosarcoma Of The Tongue, With Remarks on the Use of Trypsin and Amylopsin in the Treatment of Malignant Disease" JAMA 47, 2003-08. 1906.
5. Gotze, H, Rotham SS: Enterohepatic Circulation of Digestive Enzymes As A Conservative Mechanism" Nature 257 (5527).
6. Shively, FL: "Multiple Proteolytic Enzyme Therapy Of Cancer." Dayton, Johnson-Watson, 1969.
7. Little, WL: "A Case Of Malignant Tumor, WIth Treatment." JAMA 50, 1724, 1908.
8. Kelley, WD: "One Answer To Cancer" latest update - 33,000 cancer cases over three decades. New Century Promotions 3711 Altal Loma Drive Bonita, CA 91902 800-768-8484 or 619-479-3829.
9. Isaacs JP, Lamb J: "Complementarity In Biology, The Quantization Of Molecular Motion" 1969 The John Hopkins Press, Baltimore.

Dr. William Kelley and the Metabolic Program - Trophoblast theory.

The Metabolic Program

The Metabolic Program developed by Dr. Kelley is a systematic means where any individual can gain a level of optimum health. The Kelley Program is a metabolic/nutritional system which employs evaluation tools to obtain an accurate picture of strengths and weaknesses of a person's being. From this a metabolic program is developed, specifically tailored to the needs of that individual. At the basis of the program are the concepts of non-specific metabolic therapy and metabolic typing. Basically, non-specific metabolic therapy is the building up of all the organs and systems in the body so that serious degenerative diseases, everything from cancer to heart disease to arthritis, can be defeated by the body's own immune mechanisms. Metabolic typing is: Determining the state of a person's metabolism to discern what sort of metabolic program is best for that individual. Dr. Kelley's basic premise is that the only way to treat and prevent disease is to (re)build health.

---

The Metabolic Paradigm

By definition, a science is "accumulated knowledge that has been systematically formulated with reference to the discovery of universal TRUTHS of the operation of universal laws." And, to be a science, the procedure MUST be systematic, repeatable, testable and verifiable. In EVERY respect, The College of Metabolic Medicine's Metabolic Paradigm meets the requirements of a science.

Metabolic Health care professionals are research assistants: adding to the accumulated knowledge by providing disciplined documentation of treatment and response of those you educate and assist in the program.

Although each case is only anecdotal by itself, many cases, once compiled, will show strong correlation's that will assist in conveying the value of this science to the greater medical community.

---

About Us

Kelley Metabolic Center, Inc. for Metabolic Therapy. The core of this nutritional protocol is the science commonly known as "Metabolic Typing". Its founder and scientific creator is Dr. William Donald Kelley, founder of the International Health Institute and co-founder of The College of Metabolic Medicine. As you discover more information about this unique science during your visit to this website, you should know that Dr. Kelley's work has been literally DECADES ahead of any other nutritional program currently in the world. His current book, "CANCER, CURING THE INCURABLE".

Although cancer is a serious disease, there are dozens of other metabolic disorders that can be positively affected by the correct metabolic protocol. We know through Dr. Kelley's research during the past 45 years, that cancer, like most degenerative diseases is also a DEFICIENCY disease.

A PANCREATIC ENZYME DEFICIENCY,combined also with a slight hormonal imbalance. But Dr. Kelley was not the first to prove this, Dr. John Beard in the 19th century, after 20 years of intense clinical research was the first to discover this scientific fact.

Metabolic typing is one of Dr. Kelley's major scientific discoveries that addresses each individual BIOCHEMICALLY. This is called "BIOCHEMICAL INDIVIDUALITY". Just like your finger print, we all have a unique cell print, which genetically determines what type of foods we thrive best on. This premise is based upon the AUTONOMIC NERVOUS SYSTEM. Thus nutritional supplements are also designed for each specific metabolic type. As you learn more of this science from our website, you will begin to understand the 12 basic metabolic types and where you may currently be on Dr. Kelley's Metabolic SPIRAL OF HEALTH.

Another tool in the health arena that has GROSSLY been overlooked during the last century is CELLULAR DETOXIFICATION. To learn more about this, go to detoxification part of this site. With the advent of commercial pesticides, fungicides, herbicides, nitrates and nitrites at ALL levels of farming here in the U.S., combined with steroids, antibiotics, and growth hormones in beef, poultry and other commercial farm animals, the need to detoxify ourselves is at a RECORD HIGH.

So whether you are in fairly good health, an athlete, or are fighting a degenerative disease, consider a METABOLIC approach. This science is based upon ORTHOMOLECULAR MEDICINE, which is quite a mouthful, but simply put means, the straight molecule. It will help you to straighten ALL of your cells while rebalancing and detoxifying all systems in your body.

https://testingcancer.com/doctors/dr-kelly/

Cancer - The Forbidden Cures

FALSE LOGIC: When Treating Cancer Is Not an Option

This article has so much false logic, narrow minded logic and many options not mentioned or considered! Why? Personal comments from 25 years of testing cancer patients reveals a much different view than the article presents, are written in red.

When Treating Cancer Is Not an Option

By JANE E. BRODY

 NOVEMBER 19, 2012, 12:01 AM

Jane Brody on health and aging.

When my husband learned he had advanced lung cancer, he didn’t even want to speak to an oncologist about chemotherapy.He saw no point in treatment that could not cure him and might make him feel worse.

Not so, though, for a majority of patients diagnosed with cancers of the lung or colon that have spread well beyond their original site and are currently not curable by any drugs in the medical armamentarium. Most patients with these so-called stage 4 cancers who choose to undergo chemotherapy seem to believe, incorrectly, that the drugs could render them cancer-free.

That is the finding of a recent national study of nearly 1,200 patients with advanced cancers of the lung or colon. Overall, 69 percent of those with stage 4 lung cancer and 81 percent of those with stage 4 colon cancer failed to understand “that chemotherapy was not at all likely to cure their cancer,” Truth-stage 4 cancer should not be offered chemotherapy since we know chemotherapy will make cancer worse. Why would you take that option? Why would you not look at alternative options like these. (http://bit.ly/chemodamage) Dr. Jane C. Weeks, an oncology researcher at the Dana-Farber Cancer Institute in Boston, and colleagues reported in The New England Journal of Medicine. 

When patients do not understand the limitations of such treatment, their consent to undergo it is not truly informed, the authors concluded. Why don't they offer alternative treatment that anyone can find and with which many have benefited? http://bit.ly/kelleymetabolic 

This is not to say that chemotherapy is pointless when cancer is far advanced. Various drugs, some with limited toxicity, can be used as palliatives, perhaps shrinking tumors temporarily to relieve symptoms, slowing the cancer’s growth and prolonging the lives of some patients. False logic: shrink the tumor and greatly exascerbate the level of cancer insuring death by chemo and the spread of cancer called metastasis; Over 90% of all fatalities of cancer are caused by metastasis so why would you want to predict and cause this outcome?

But aggressive chemotherapy when death is but weeks or months in the offing can seriously compromise the quality of patients’ remaining time and may delay their preparations for the end of life, to the detriment of both patients and their families. After interviewing and testing thousands of people who took alternative methods for healing this prediction is only valid if you choose chemotherapy or radiation but much less predicable and safer methods. Many have seen success and many years of quality life with alternative methods are chosen. 

“If you think chemotherapy will cure you, you’re less open to end-of-life discussions,” Dr. Weeks said in an interview.

When patients pursue chemotherapy under the false belief that they still have a chance for a cure, it often delays their transition to the comfort care of hospice. When patients spend only a few days or a week in hospice, caretakers don’t have enough time to get to know them and their families and offer the physical, emotional and practical benefits hospice can provide. (Narrow minded thinking-many interviews revealed hospice is often no better than the outcome experienced by Kevorkian-death by drugs, but alternatives have better options, but are not often offered because there is not insurance coverage and thread between hospice and the hosptical discharge process for stage 4 cancer patients is a very tight thread. If the doctor beleives you are already dead and it is only a matter of time, he will send you to hospice and they will complete the task of death with drug overdose and no or poor nutrition).

Dr. Weeks said continued chemotherapy involves more trips to the hospital, blood draws and X-rays, whereas hospice attends to patients’ symptoms and concerns, and encourages them to leave meaningful legacies. When my husband entered hospice after two miserable weeks in the hospital undergoing palliative radiation, he experienced such relief that he said cheerfully, though in jest, “What if I decide I want to live?” and then enjoyed a treasured last visit with two of his grandchildren.

‘Optimistic Bias’

Communication is a two-way street; doctors and patients alike contribute to patients’ failure to appreciate medicine’s limited ability to treat advanced cancer. After many interviews this is a total cop out. The patient is frightened and made more so by the doctor and staff with predictions of death. With a modicum of research and reading like books titled "Cancer as a Metabolic Disease" by Seyfried, they could offer and suggest alternatives to patients. WHat is the key issue? There is no payment for this advice so offering something other than treatment for which the doctor is paid over $300,000 to $400,000 is at cross purposes. Chemotherapy is the only drug for which an oncologist can write a prescription and personally profit. http://bit.ly/chemo95failure 

In an editorial accompanying the journal report, Dr. Thomas J. Smith and Dr. Dan L. Longo pointed out that “people have an optimistic bias.” Despite a grim prognosis, this bias prompts patients to believe treatment can cure them. 

“Even with repeated discussions, about one-third of patients are not able to say they have a disease from which they will die in a year or so,” Dr. Smith, an oncologist and director of palliative care at Johns Hopkins Sidney Kimmel Comprehensive Cancer Center, said in an interview.

“Our job is not to force them into acceptance but to encourage them to plan for the worst while hoping for the best,” Dr. Smith said. “Such patients have better outcomes — less depression and less distress, and they’re more likely to die comfortably at home.”

Cultural and racial factors, and most likely religious beliefs, influence acceptance of the futility of continued treatment, Dr. Weeks said. In her study, nonwhite and Hispanic patients were more likely than whites to believe that chemotherapy could cure them. But surprisingly, patients’ educational level, degree of disability and participation in decision-making were not associated with inaccurate beliefs about chemotherapy.

What can make a huge difference, Dr. Smith said, is how and how often doctors discuss options with patients and describe the potential of continued treatment. He and Dr. Longo suggested that practitioners master “the conversation known as ‘ask, tell, ask,’ which consists of asking patients what they want to know about their prognosis, telling them what they want to know, and then asking, ‘What do you now understand about your situation?’ ”

Among the questions Dr. Smith said doctors should be asking are, “How much do you want to know about your cancer? What do you know about your cancer? Who would you like to include in discussions about your care? Would you like me to write down the important points? What is important to you? What are you hoping for? Who are your other doctors so that I can communicate with them?”

Continuing Discussion

Finally, he said, rather than asking the patient “do you have any questions?” the doctor should ask, “Now that we have discussed this, what is your understanding of your situation?” And rather than having this conversation only once, Dr. Smith said, “It should be repeated at every transition point.”

He and Dr. Longo also recommend that oncologists state the patient’s prognosis at the first visit, appoint someone in the office to discuss advance directives, schedule a hospice-information visit, and offer to discuss prognosis and coping at each transition.

Using this approach, practitioners in the US Oncology Network, a group of community-based oncology physicians, have doubled the time patients spend in hospice, decreased costs, alleviated patients’ symptoms, reduced stress on caregivers and often lengthened survival, Dr. Smith said. Various studies have shown that cancer patients in hospice live weeks to months longer than comparable patients not in hospice care.

When doctors fail to give direct, clear information, Dr. Smith suggests that patients ask, “What is my prognosis, really? What are my options? Can I meet with the palliative care and hospice teams?”

He noted, “This is the hardest conversation for doctors to have. A lot of doctors wait for someone to bring it up.” If the patient does not, then a family member can initiate the needed discussion. 

Cancer Treatment Documentary: Conventional vs Natural [2013]

Part 3 - One Answer To Cancer - Speach about Dr. Kelley

Part 2 - One Answer To Cancer - Speach about Dr. Kelley

One Answer To Cancer - Speach about Dr. Kelley

Chemotherapy 97 percent failure

The fallacy of risk reducing mastectomy